deathtrappomegranate wrote:I've been using this, but with mixed results.
Does anyone have good experiences with this utility?
[edited for typos and content]
Some good experiences, more bad experiences, lots of frustration.
I went looking for a program like WAV2CAS when I decided I wanted to review my own programs which I had written 22-25 years ago. I needed such a utility because I no longer own an Atari tape player and frankly did not wish to own one once again.
Trying to make the story short, I have about a half dozen commercial tapes and 35-40 tapes with my own stuff, mainly multiple saves and revisions of just a mere dozen or so programs, combined with magazine programs.
I thought WAV2CAS would be perfect, just convert everything to WAV files and then I'd have everything. It didn't work out that way.
I converted two of the six commercial tape without much trouble. Two tapes were unusable. They had huge audio gaps and nothing could be done to save them. The other tapes clearly had data but I was unable to retrieve it. Since disk images of these programs were already available on the internet I didn't really make any more effort to retrieve the games.
I then moved on to my own tapes. I went thru 12 or so tapes but recovered only 2 program fragments. It took me hours and hours to get that much. At that point I reached out for help in the Atari 8-bit newsgroup. Ernest Schreurs, the author of WAV2CAS, replied.
He gave me a lot of assistance. Sent me a beta of his latest version of WAV2CAS, told me to try adjusting record levels (PC software record levels) , offered to help me with recovery. (I didn't want to send my tapes from here in the USA to New Zealand). Mentioned I should use 8-bit recording, because 16-bit doesn't help and it doubles the size of the WAV files. We discussed stereo vs mono. He explained that one channel has audio and the other has the data but blending both audio channel doesn't affect the algorithm. Though, recording in stereo also doubles the size of the WAV file. I told Ernest that I could hear audio spikes in the tapes and asked if that effects the data recovery. He said it's possible but generally not. The algorithm is only looking at two frequencies (not counting interprogram and interrecord gaps). Random noise should not affect the results. The only thing that would serious affect the results is dropouts, points of missing sound. There is not much redundancy if any (my speculation not Ernest's words) designed into tape files. Long dropouts means missing data, irrecoverable missing data.
Well, after 3 or 4 emails I didn't make much progress if any, then I received an email from Vladimir Tichy, designer of the ATART interface (like a 1050-2-PC interface and an SIO2PC rolled into one but for Atari tape drives instead of an Atari disk drive (see link at the end). Vladimir suggested I adjust my tape deck's perpendicularity. I decided this was impractical and probably unwarranted since my tape, though old, is virtually unused. Vladimir then suggested that I adjust my tape deck's play back levels. I explained to him that my deck's levels are fixed but his idea got me to thinking.
I contacted Ernest about this. He said his algorithm doesn't care about levels only frequencies and that I could simply adjust the record level at the PC end. I told him that I was at max record level but could barely hear anything. At this point I'm not sure Ernest gave me the advice or I just decided to go off on my own but I reconfigured my receiver to act as a preamp, so I could increase the effective levels that the PC receives.
Things improved, nothing miraculous, though. I went from near 0% data recovery to about 10% (a guess). With plenty of experimenting I learned that for any tape I owned that showed playback levels of -25 dB or lower (on my tape deck's meters) I would not recover anything. From -18 dB to say -8 dB I typically was able to recover one or two files from each tape (not each side but each tape) . Generally I recorded 4 or 5 files per side. No tapes that I created had playback levels higher than -8 dB. For comparision the commercial tapes typically played back at +8 dB (the max calibration on my deck's meters).
Things that hurt my recovery include using cheap department store tapes 25 years ago, not properly documenting what was on the tapes. For example, some tapes had CSAVEd files, binary load files, LISTed files, SAVEd files, in no particular order. Tape counter numbers did me no good having tossed out my Atari Tape player years ago.
I initially used MusicMatch Jukebox to do my PC recordings. This program only records in stereo and WAV2CAS generated an error to the effect, "you must use a mono recording". I ended up using the sofware that came with my sound card. I also ran a cable for single sound channel from my receiver, just in case.
It was still too much work for too little payoff. I gave up.
Well, that's my story. Your mileage may vary. Of course, for the purpose of preserving commercial tapes. The sooner the attempt is made the better. Tapes do degrade.
Vladimir Tichy's ATART looks interesting. Apparently it combines software, a custom interface, and an Atari tape player modification all to improve speed, reliability, and flexibility for both real tape and CAS files. The technicals are way over my head.
I said I would make my story short but I didn't promise to do it.
Regards to all
Phsstpok
Links
Ernest Schreurs homepage
http://home.planet.nl/~ernest/home.html
Vladimir Tichy's ATART page (English version)
http://sdq.czweb.org/atari/projects/atart/index.html